Starling v. Suffolk County Water Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a law is \clearly established\ by precedents of the Supreme Court, the Eleventh Circuit, or \the highest court of the state in which the case arose\
• upholding an award of attorney's fees, inter alia, because the disparity between the $500,000 in damages requested and the $1 received was not \an outrageous split\
• granting qualified immunity to a teacher and police officer who strip-searched a fifth-grade group to find a missing $26, because, although the search constituted a violation, it was not \clearly established\
• upholding an award of attorney’s fees, inter alia, because the disparity between the $500,000 in damages requested and the $1 received was not “an outrageous split”
• granting qualified immunity to a teacher and police officer who strip-searched a fifth-grade group to find a missing $26, because, although the search constituted a violation, it was not “clearly established”
• facts in comparator case so different as to offer little guidance and inadequate warning that conduct is unconstitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).