Starling v. Royal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An argument made only in a footnote is not worthy of credence (other than to be rejected by footnote).”
• “An argument made only in a footnote is not worthy of credence (other than to be rejected by footnote).”
• “An argument made only in a footnote is not worthy of credence (other than to be rejected by footnote).”
• “An argument made only in a footnote is not worthy of credence (other than to be rejected by footnote).”
• “[T]he reasonableness of the interest rate is generally a question of fact that requires the presentation of evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).