· 9/18/1975
Starlie Lomayaktewa v. Stanley K. Hathaway, and Arizona Public Service Company, Intervenors-Appellees
Citations
- 520 F.2d 1324
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the Hopi Tribe of Arizona is a necessary and indispensable party to a 1 for a res, i.e., a strip of land
- Hopi Tribe was a necessary party to a suit by an individual challenging a 11 lease between the Hopi Tribe and a coal company
- “[n]o procedural principle is more deeply imbedded in the common law than that, in an action to set aside a lease or a contract, all parties who may be affected by the determination of the action are indispensable”
- tribal members sought to void lease entered into' by absent tribe
- “No procedural principle is more deeply imbedded in the common law than that, in an action to set aside a lease or a contract, all parties who may be affected by the determination of the action are indispensable.”
- plaintiff sought to cancel lease on which absent tribe was lessor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning, Duniway, Orrick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.