Skip to main content
· 9/18/1975

Starlie Lomayaktewa v. Stanley K. Hathaway, and Arizona Public Service Company, Intervenors-Appellees

Citations

  • 520 F.2d 1324

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the Hopi Tribe of Arizona is a necessary and indispensable party to a 1 for a res, i.e., a strip of land
  • Hopi Tribe was a necessary party to a suit by an individual challenging a 11 lease between the Hopi Tribe and a coal company
  • “[n]o procedural principle is more deeply imbedded in the common law than that, in an action to set aside a lease or a contract, all parties who may be affected by the determination of the action are indispensable”
  • tribal members sought to void lease entered into' by absent tribe
  • “No procedural principle is more deeply imbedded in the common law than that, in an action to set aside a lease or a contract, all parties who may be affected by the determination of the action are indispensable.”
  • plaintiff sought to cancel lease on which absent tribe was lessor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Duniway, Orrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.