Skip to main content

Starks v. State

Citations

  • 846 N.E.2d 673
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 856
  • 2006 WL 1098591

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that officers’ initial warrantless entry into the home did not violate the Fourth Amendment or Article 1, Section 11 where a resident of the home consented to the officers’ entry
  • providing that officers’ entry into a residence did not violate Article I, Section 11 because the officers were allowed into the residence by a co-inhabitant of the residence who had the authority to admit the officers into the residence
  • Randolph distinguishable where, when co-tenant consented, defendant was not physically present, and was physically present for another portion of search but did not express refusal to consent to the search
  • Randolph distinguishable where, when co-tenant consented, defendant was not physically present, and was physically present for another portion of search but did not express refusal to consent to the search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Vaidik, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.