Starkman v. Bechtel Power Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to consider whether a judge of compensation claims had applied an incorrect legal standard in originally deciding the case because \claimant had not undergone a substantial change of condition\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Olmo v. Rehabcare Starmed/SRS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-31· cited 5×
• Chastain v. Scandinavian Health Spas
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-11· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sauder v. Coast Cities Coaches, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1963-05-22· cited 14×
• General Elec. Co. v. Osborne
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-03-10· cited 10×
• Soloff v. U-Totem, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-12-16· cited 5×
• Westwinds Transp., Inc. v. Murphy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-09-18· cited 4×
• Thatcher Glass Co. v. Joseph
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-12-14· cited 4×
• Acree Oil Co. v. Peterson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-12· cited 3×
• City of Tampa v. Morales
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-12-17· cited 1×