Starkey v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that \[t]he Copyright Office no longer has the deposit copy\ of the work at issue, which was registered in 1935
• observing that “[t]he Copyright Office no longer has the deposit copy” of the work at issue, which was registered in 1935
• “[T]here is no reason to relieve the alleged owners of the intellectual property of the usual burden of proof just because they are nominally the defendants in this declaratory judgment action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).