Starfish Condominium Ass'n v. Yorkridge Service Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[i]n a condominium regime unit owners own the common elements in fee as tenants in common.”
• recognizing court's discretion to exclude testimony of expert witness who was not identified in response to interrogatory request, even if failure to disclose \was not willful or contumacious.\
• recognizing court’s discretion to exclude testimony of expert witness who was not identified in response to interrogatory request, even if failure to disclose “was not willful or contumacious.”
• requiring “the one charging fraud to establish by clear, specific facts, acts that in law constitute fraud”
• rejecting the argument that the individual unit owners’ entitlement to damages should be limited by their percentage of ownership
• finding “as is” provision insufficient to waive implied warranty of habitability because provision did not expressly name the warranty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).