Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the Board’s alter ego test — which lacks a requirement of proof of anti-union intent — to be a reasonable interpretation of the NLRA under Chevron
• stating that “if two entities are found to be alter egos, a collective bargaining agreement covering one entity is automatically deemed to cover the other” (citing Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Bd. Hotel & Rest. Employees, 417 U.S. 249, 259 n.5 (1974))
• “The Board does not require the presence of each factor to conclude that alter ego status should be applied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).