Skip to main content
· 1/9/1992

Starbuck v. Esparza

Citations

  • 821 P.2d 1216
  • 118 Wash. 2d 251
  • 16 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1217
  • 1992 Wash. LEXIS 7

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a landlord's lien was not invalid because it was filed under Esparsa instead of Esparza
  • holding a landlord’s lien was not invalid because it was filed under Esparsa instead of Esparza
  • security interest in harvested crop may exist despite lack of real estate description

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brachtenbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.