Skip to main content
· 12/14/1993

Star Technology, Inc. v. Tultex Corp.

Citations

  • 844 F. Supp. 295
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19424
  • 1993 WL 596340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to exercise personal jurisdiction over a District of Columbia lawyer in Texas when his only connections (continued . . .
  • attorney’s “sporadic contact” based on two trips to forum insufficient to support jurisdiction in copyright infringement suit by competitor of attorney’s client
  • where the district court found no personal jurisdiction over a non-resident attorney whose sole contacts in Texas were in connection with representing in litigation a client who had been adverse to the plaintiff who sued him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kendall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.