Star Publishing Co. v. Parks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “it is insufficient [for the public entity] to hypothesize cases where secrecy might prevail and then contend that the hypothetical controls all cases”
• delay of a month in furnishing public records was not permitted because public entity could not point to specific risks of timely disclosure
• one-month delay in producing public records not permitted because public entity could not prove specific risk of timely disclosure
• involving records request by newspaper
• involving records request by newspaper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).