Skip to main content
· 10/14/1993

Star Editorial, Inc. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Rodney Dangerfield, Real Party-In-Interest

Citations

  • 7 F.3d 856
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7622
  • 21 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2281
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 13004
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26664
  • 1993 WL 406484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that in a civil action in which state law provides the rule of decision, the privilege of a witness shall be determined in accordance with state law
  • upholding district court’s decision to grant motion to compel Star Editorial to reveal confidential sources in libel suit by public figure
  • “[I]f the district court erred in compelling disclosure, any damage the [newspaper] suffered would not be correctable on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Wiggins, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.