Skip to main content
· 1/3/1922

Star Drilling Machine Co. v. Richards

Citations

  • 272 Pa. 383
  • 116 A. 309
  • 23 A.L.R. 1460
  • 1922 Pa. LEXIS 834

Syllabus

<p>Gontract — ■Sale—Payments—Inconsistent recoveries — Election of remedy — Principal and surety.</p> <p>1. Where a contract provides that payments for merchandise delivered shall be made from time to time, the title thereto to remain in the payee until a certain amount has been paid, and the latter thereafter retakes possession of the property, his right to receive future payments at once ceases.</p> <p>2. This rule is applicable though suit to recover the payments was begun before the property was taken by the payee.</p> <p>3. A litigant who is entitled to either one of two inconsistent recoveries, cannot by his order of procedure obtain the right to both.</p> <p>4. lie who elects to disaffirm a contract, and acts upon his election, cannot afterwards affirm it to the injury of another; this is particularly true where the latter is a surety.</p>

Judges: Frazer, Kephart, Simpson, Sohapper, Walling

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.