Stapleton v. Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding cost shifting appropriate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 371 (“Rule 37”)
• finding cost shifting appropriate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 371 (“Rule 37”)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority
  First Circuit· 1982-08-11· cited 50×
• Hicks v. Kawasaki Heavy Industries
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1978-06-15· cited 29×
• Cook v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.
  S.D. West Virginia· 1984-03-13· cited 5×
• Ex Parte Maple Chase Co.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2002-06-28· cited 3×
• Dickerson v. Alabama Home Mortgage Co.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2002-06-28· cited 1×
• Conemaugh Coal v. Pittsburgh Contractors
  Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas· 1982-06-18
• Sessoms v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2024-12-31