Skip to main content
· 3/3/1987

Staples v. Hoefke

Citations

  • 189 Cal. App. 3d 1397
  • 235 Cal. Rptr. 165
  • 1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to reverse a judgment for mere failure to award nominal damages where there was no absolute entitlement to costs and no permanent right at stake
  • landlord can be liable for nuisance created by tenant when landlord leases property with knowledge that tenant would create nuisance
  • “we can perceive of no reason why plaintiffs should profit from defendant Hoefke’s foresight in obtaining insurance coverage”
  • “Plaintiffs were not 7 entitled to avoid their contractual obligation to pay reasonable 8 attorney fees based on the fortuitous circumstance that they sued a 9 defendant who obtained insurance coverage providing a defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kriegler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.