Stanton v. Waterfront Ctr. for Rehabilitation & Healthcare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A large discrepancy occurring over a sustained period of time where there is an opportunity for arbitrary selection is sufficient to demonstrate that the exclusion of the underrepresentation is systematic— that is, inherent in the particular jury selection process utilized.”
• ages 18-34 is not a distinctive group

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).