Stanton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that while the question implying unethical conduct in \gypsy practice\ was highly prejudicial and improper, there was no fundamental error where defense objection had been sustained and there was no request for instruction or mistrial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• MCI Exp., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-09-30· cited 12×
• Simpson v. K-Mart Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-01-24· cited 2×
• Tucker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-10-03
• Gray v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-12-12

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Snyder v. Massachusetts
  Supreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 2,822×
• State v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1967-11-22· cited 144×
• Casso v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-01-28· cited 31×
• State Ex Rel. Larkins v. Lewis
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1951-09-21· cited 18×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-09-11· cited 16×
• McLendon v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1954-09-24· cited 13×
• Padgett v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1955-09-14· cited 6×
• Pan American Bank of Dade County v. Continental Casualty Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-08-30· cited 1×