Supreme Court· 1/25/1977
Stanton v. Stanton
Citations
- 429 U.S. 501
- 97 S. Ct. 717
- 50 L. Ed. 2d 723
- 1977 U.S. LEXIS 39
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- state may establish age of majority for child support purposes anywhere between eighteen and twenty-one
- “[W]e emphasize that Utah is free to adopt either 18 or 21 as the age of majority for both males and females for child‐ support purposes. The only constraint on its power to choose is … that the two sexes must be treated equally.”
- “[W]e emphasize that Utah is free to adopt either 18 or 21 as the age of majority for both males and females for child‐ support purposes. The only constraint on its power to choose is … that the two sexes must be treated equally.”
- Justice Stevens dissenting in part
- Justice Stevens dissenting in part
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stevens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Illinois Republican Party v. J. B. PritzkerSeventh Circuit· 2020-09-03· cited 416×
- Califano v. JobstSupreme Court· 1977-11-08· cited 366×
- Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-11-30· cited 155×
- Roger G. Des Vergnes v. Seekonk Water DistrictFirst Circuit· 1979-06-25· cited 105×
- Bailey v. BaileyMississippi Supreme Court· 1998-12-10· cited 85×
- McBroom v. ChildUtah Supreme Court· 2016-08-26· cited 20×
- Felix v. MillikenE.D. Michigan· 1978-12-22· cited 17×
- Farrell Lines, Inc. v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1981-08-20· cited 16×
- Quilter v. VoinovichN.D. Ohio· 1995-08-11· cited 13×
- Carlson v. CarlsonUtah Supreme Court· 1978-09-08· cited 12×
- McBroom v. Shauna Child SchmunkUtah Supreme Court· 2016-11-22· cited 12×
- Stanton v. StantonUtah Supreme Court· 1977-05-05· cited 10×
- Allen T. Gabree v. Edward J. KingFirst Circuit· 1980-01-15· cited 7×
- Munck v. MunckAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-07-05· cited 7×
- Farrell Lines, Inc. v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1982-02-04· cited 7×
- Stanton v. StantonUtah Supreme Court· 1977-06-29· cited 3×
- Steven Bailey v. Sandra Russell BaileyMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-04-07
- In re Estate of RC WilleyUtah Supreme Court· 2016-11-22
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.