Stanley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing a conviction for burglary when the State failed to prove that there was an entry into the store
• “In order to prove the burglary, the state must prove a nonconsensual entry with intent to commit an offense therein.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-27· cited 13×
• Nickell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-11· cited 10×
• Dunbar v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-17· cited 1×
• Warram v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-23· cited 1×
• Simmons v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-26
• Marshall v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-23
• Styles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-01

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nelson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-31· cited 33×
• State v. Hankins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-10-29· cited 18×
• Miller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-05-17· cited 10×
• Foster v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-02-25· cited 10×
• E.J.K. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-08· cited 4×
• State v. Spearman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-12-13· cited 3×