Skip to main content

Stanley v. Stanley

Citations

  • 201 W. Va. 174
  • 495 S.E.2d 273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that circuit court erred in not granting Rule 60(b) motion where husband’s pension plan was incorrectly valued and parties entered into settlement agreement based on incorrect valuation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.