Skip to main content
· 9/12/2006

Stanley v. CONOCOPHILLIPS PIPE LINE CO.

Citations

  • 451 F. Supp. 2d 1286
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65070
  • 2006 WL 2615544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding no duty to train claim allowed by invitee and that such claim \is no different from the duty to warn because a warning may include such education\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murguia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.