Stanley Trzebuckowski Lecue, Inc. v. City of Cleveland Lauren C. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a challenge to a dismissal of a due-process claim was waived for failure to object to the Report and Recommendation
• explaining that courts should “look to the event that should have alerted the typical lay person to protect his or her rights”
• explaining distinction between continuing violation and continuing effect of prior violation that was alleged to have effected taking
• “[W]e look to the event that should have alerted the typical lay person to protect his or her rights.”
• “In determining when the cause of action accrues in § 1983 cases, we look to the event that should have alerted the typical lay person to protect his or her rights.”
• “In determining when the cause of action accrues in § 1983 cases, we look to the event that should have alerted the typical lay person to protect his or her rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).