Skip to main content
· 10/31/2000

Stanley Sanders v. Michael F. Easley, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina R. C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina

Citations

  • 230 F.3d 679
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 27203
  • 2000 WL 1624498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the question is not whether the state court has erred in our view, but whether the decision of the state court was contrary to or involved an unreasonable application of Supreme Court law
  • at the “extreme” end of the spectrum when double jeopardy applies “are situations in which the prosecution seeks a mistrial in order to have additional time to marshal evidence to strengthen the case against the defendant”
  • at the \extreme\ end of the spectrum when double jeopardy applies \are situations in which the prosecution seeks a mistrial in order to have additional time to marshal evidence to strengthen the case against the defendant\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkins, Luttig, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.