Skip to main content
· 3/12/2001

Stanley L. Malkin v. United States

Citations

  • 243 F.3d 120
  • 56 Fed. R. Serv. 1061
  • 87 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1180
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 3726

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting petitioner's contention that the evidence was insufficient to support the district court's finding that he signed an agreement to extend the statute of limitations on assessment
  • rejecting petitioner’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to support the district court’s finding that he signed an agreement to extend the statute of limitations on assessment
  • analyzing “IDRS literal transcript” and related codes in affirming district court decision
  • “[IRS transcript] entries, taken with IRS employees’ testimony as to their general practice, were sufficient to demonstrate that the taxpayer had executed [a waiver of the statute of limitations].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Kearse, Korman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.