Stanley Jancik v. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Leadership Council for Metropolitan Open Communities and Marsha Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering context, including two statements that indicated express prefer- ence against children and teenagers, to determine that ‘‘ ‘mature person preferred’ ’’ advertisement expressed impermissible preference
• finding defendant’s statements that he “did not want any families with children ... quite clearly would suggest to an ‘ordinary’ listener that [defendant] had a preference or limitation based on family status”
• “Significantly, no showing of a subjective intent to discriminate is . . . necessary to establish a violation of [§ 3604(c)].”
• collecting cases from the Second, Fourth, and Sixth Circuits
• involving conduct in the rental of an apartment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).