Stanley Industries, Inc. v. WM Barr & Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that adequacy of warnings provided only in English is jury issue where item was marketed to Hispanic population
• “Plaintiff’s contention that the defendants inadequately conveyed warnings . . . demonstrates the overlapping of adequacy and proximate cause . . . .”
• products liability case holding that manufacturer and retailer had duty to include warnings on product in Spanish instead of just English when the product was marketed in Hispanic media
• products liability case holding that manufacturer and retailer had duty to include warnings on product in Spanish instead of just English when the product was marketed in Hispanic media

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).