Skip to main content
· 1/10/1987

Stanley Glasser, Miriam Glasser, His Wife v. Amalgamated Workers Union Local 88, R.W.D.S.U., Afl-Cio

Citations

  • 806 F.2d 1539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “[t]he appellants’ substantive rights . . . [were] not affected” because the state court on remand “c[ould] proceed to hear the case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roney, Hill, Kravitch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.