Stanley Davis, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Eunice D.C. Davis v. ESC II, LP D/B/A Emeritus at Vickery Towers, Laila Hirjee, M.D., and Laila Hirjee M.D. P.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment for employer because plaintiff did “not establish[] a genuine dis- pute about the decisionmakers’ knowledge”
• analyzing the time limit in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 6 Nos. 20‐3279, 20‐3280, 20‐3281 & 20‐3282 4(a)(5)(C) as a waivable claims‐processing rule rather than a limit governing our jurisdiction
• enforcing waiver against defend- ants who admitted appeal was timely, then argued other- wise
• enforcing waiver against defend- ants who admitted appeal was timely, then argued other- wise
• non-jurisdictional rules that affect the validity of an appeal normally must be raised in the par- ties’ docketing statements
• “Speculative assertions about decisionmakers’ knowledge are insufficient to establish a genuine dispute about a material fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).