Stanley, David Earl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the trial court may award spousal support only after the court has equitably divided the parties’ marital property”
• explaining that when this Court is “left to wonder about the trial court’s decision[,]” we are unable to conduct a meaningful appellate review
• noting that in light of a remand for further analysis on property valuation, “we must necessarily . . . vacate the distribution of marital property”
• noting that this Court cannot determine whether a trial court abused its discretion in the absence of factual findings by the trial court
• affirming sentence of fifty-five to be served as 20 days’ incarceration on consecutive weekends for eighteen findings of contempt
• vacating awards of alimony and attorney’s fees in light of need to re-evaluate the marital estate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).