Skip to main content
· 8/16/2005

Stanko v. Mahar

Citations

  • 419 F.3d 1107
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 17323
  • 2005 WL 1953514

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “An action under § 1983, however, cannot be maintained on the basis of alleged violations of state law.”
  • “Federal law rather than state law governs the use of summary judgment in the federal courts.”
  • rejecting § 1983 claim under the Wyoming Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucero, McKay, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.