· 8/30/1996
Stanislaw Opoka v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Citations
- 94 F.3d 392
- 45 Fed. R. Serv. 740
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22670
- 1996 WL 494164
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that proceedings in other courts, both inside and outside the federal system, may be judicially noticed
- “[I]t is a well-settled principle that the decision of another court or agency . . . is a proper subject of judicial notice.”
- “This court, however, has the power, in fact the obligation, to take judicial notice of the relevant decisions of courts and administrative agencies, whether made before or after the decision under review.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Kanne, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.