Stanislaw Nowak v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “aliens who distrust the Postal Service must check with the Board every so often, just as litigants in district court must check periodically with the clerk....”
• observing that “aliens who distrust the Postal Service must check with the Board every so often, just as litigants in district court must check periodically with the clerk . . . .”
• rejecting Zaluski and Ouedraogo as inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s later decision in Stone
• “Neither [Zaluski v. INS, 37 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 1994), nor Ouedraogo v. INS, 864 F.2d 376 (5th Cir. 1989

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).