Skip to main content
· 4/27/2009

Stanifer v. Brannan

Citations

  • 564 F.3d 455
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8839
  • 2009 WL 1107910

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Sections 1406 and 1631 “confer broad discretion in ruling on a motion to transfer” venue
  • noting that Sections 1406 and 1631 “confer broad discretion in ruling on a motion to transfer” venue
  • holding district court did not abuse its discretion ordering dismissal of plaintiff who showed a “complete lack of diligence in determining the proper forum in the first place”
  • reviewing for abuse of discretion a District Court’s decision not to transfer a case pursuant to § 1406(a)
  • noting the district court’s broad discretion under section 1406(a) to dismiss or transfer a case if in the interest of justice
  • explaining court’s discretion to deny transfer where there was no “assertion of . . . personal jurisdiction that provided some arguable basis for thinking that the action was properly brought in the district in which it was originally filed,” even if re-filing is time-barred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Daughtrey, Gibbons, Zatkoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.