Stanich v. Precision Body and Paint, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evaluating whether the plaintiff had “establish[ed] a prima facie case of retaliatory discharge on a theory that defendants carried out their decision to fire plaintiff because she filed a workers’ compensation claim.”
• full and fair opportunity to litigate encompasses notion that a party have had a strong incentive to litigate issue subject to preclusion
• we ordinarily do no^ address arguments not made to the trial court
• court held that plaintiff was barred from relitigating whether she knew on a specific date that her job was in jeopardy based on ALJ’s previous finding that she had such knowledge.
• new claim in reply brief will not be considered
• new claim in reply would not be considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).