Skip to main content
· 6/4/2015

Stangel Family Trust v. Stangel

Citations

  • 188 Wash. App. 1005

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]t is the six months immediately preceding the filing of the petition that is most critical to [the court’s] analysis” under Subsection 2511(a)(1)
  • an incarcerated parent’s inquires of others, without following through on the inquiries, does not rise to the level of a good- faith effort to maintain a parent-child relationship
  • It is well-settled that “[p]arental rights may not be preserved by waiting for some more suitable financial circumstance or convenient time for the performance of parental duties and responsibilities.”
  • “parental rights may be terminated pursuant to Section 2511(a)(1) if the parent either demonstrates a settled purpose of relinquishing parental claim to a child or fails to perform parental duties.”
  • “parental rights may be terminated pursuant to Section 2511(a)(1) if the parent either demonstrates a settled purpose of relinquishing parental claim to a child or fails to perform parental duties.”
  • “parental rights may be terminated pursuant to Section 2511(a)(1) if the parent either demonstrates a settled purpose of relinquishing parental claim to a child or fails to perform parental duties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bjorgen, Sutton, Worswick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.