Stange v. Cleveland
Citations
- 26 Ohio C.C. Dec. 186
- 25 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 599
Syllabus
<p>MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — WORK AND LABOR.</p> <p>Power of Charter City to Regulate Hours of Day Labor on Public Improvements Before State Act Takes Effect.</p> <p>A municipality having adopted a charter pursuant to Art. 18, Sec. 3, of the constitution, the Home Rule amendment, may enact police regulations which differ from police regulations enacted by the general assembly. Hence, an ordinance of a charter city, prescribing an eight hour day labor limitation on public work in pursuance of Art. 2, Sec. 37, of the constitution, and imposing a penalty for its violation, is a valid enactment, notwithstanding it was passed and took effect prior to the enactment and taking effect of Act 103 O. L. 854 (Secs. 17-1 and 17-2 G. C.), includes all workmen so engaged, and applies to'violations thereof occurring before the state act took effect.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “This court cannot stay action under section 605(c)(5) ... or proceed on a claim under the CDA in the absence of a decision, or deemed denial of a claim, by the contracting officer.”
- because the court lacked jurisdiction, a stay was improper
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carpenter, Grant, Meals
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.