Skip to main content
· 5/24/2006

Stanford T.E. McClure Jr. v. Career Systems Development Corporation Vinnell Corporation

Citations

  • 447 F.3d 1133
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 12810
  • 87 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,402
  • 98 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 119
  • 2006 WL 1409419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing “good cause” showing for sealing 1144 documents produced in discovery from “compelling reasons” standard when 1155 merits-related documents are part of court record
  • recognizing suspension without pay is an adverse employment action
  • employee hired over three years later, with no other facts in record, was not similarly situated in all relevant respects to the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Bowman, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.