Skip to main content
· 11/26/2002

Stanford Square, L.L.C. v. Nomura Asset Capital Corp.

Citations

  • 232 F. Supp. 2d 289
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22900
  • 2002 WL 31681182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \It is well settled that state law applies to an award of prejudgment interest in a diversity action in federal court.\
  • “Money does not become due and payable, and is not considered in default and interest does not begin to’ run, until a demand for it has been made.”
  • amending a judgment under Rule 59(e) to add prejudgment interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marrero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.