· 7/15/1996
STANFORD RANCH, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Citations
- 89 F.3d 618
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 8427
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5212
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17317
- 1996 WL 391774
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] claim dependent on the existence of an underlying contract, sounds in contract, as opposed to tort.”
- “[A] claim dependent on the existence of an underlying contract sounds in contract, as opposed to tort.”
- “If a claim is dependent upon the existence of an underlying contract, the claim sounds in contract, as opposed to tort.”
- “It is the duty of the appellate court to make its own independent determination of the meaning of the language used in the contract under considera- tion.”
- If there is 12 no coverage, the inquiry ends as “[t]here is no need to look to the exclusions because they cannot 13 expand the basic coverage granted in the insuring agreement.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson, Tashima, Burns
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.