Skip to main content

Stanfield v. State

Citations

  • 43 Tex. 167

Syllabus

<p>Aggravated assault—Guardian and ward.—The indictment charged the accused with committing an. aggravated assault on his ward in beating the child in a cruel, outrageous, and vicious manner, with intent to injure. The jury was instructed that if defendant inflicted a castigation upon the person of his ward with an unusual instrument, and one that was calculated to inflict serious injuries to his person, they must find him guilty: Held, error, because the charge made the instrument the test of unlawful correction, and this error was not corrected by a charge to acquit, “unless the chastisement was done in a cruel and vindictive manner,” for that made the manner of the punishment and not its extent the test of guilt.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reaffirming that “endangering conduct is not limited to actions directed towards the child” and can include actions occurring “while the parent had custody of older children”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.