Skip to main content
· 12/6/1977

Stands Over Bull v. Bureau of Indian Affairs

Citations

  • 442 F. Supp. 360
  • 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When a defendant has failed to file an answer, a motion for judgment on the pleadings is not the correct procedural remedy.”
  • “When a[ny] defendant has failed to file an answer, a motion for judgment on the pleadings is not the correct procedural remedy.” (citing Gen. Motors Corp. v. Blevins, 144 F. Supp. 381, 389 (D. Colo. 1956))
  • “When a[ny] defendant has failed to file an answer, a motion for judgment on the pleadings is not the correct procedural remedy.” (citing Gen. Motors Corp. v. Blevins, 144 F. Supp. 381, 389 (D. Colo. 1956))
  • “When a defendant has failed to file an 2 According to the SSA, most disability claims “are initially processed through a network of local . . . field offices and State agencies (usually called Disability Determination Services or DDSs
  • “When a defendant has failed to file an answer, a motion for judgment 10 on the pleadings is not the correct procedural remedy. . . . Judgment on the pleadings 11 under Rule 12(c) is available only when the pleadings are closed.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Battin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.