Standridge v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a pre-suit demand letter was “nothing more than posturing by plaintiff’s counsel for settlement purposes and cannot be considered a reliable indicator of the damages plaintiff is seeking”
• holding that a pre-suit demand letter was “nothing more than posturing by plaintiff’s counsel for settlement purposes and cannot be considered a reliable indicator of the damages plaintiff is seeking”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).