Standard Parts Co. v. Peck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an independent contractor engaged to “devote his time to the development of a process and machinery” to solve a particular problem for compensation had no legal right to a patent on the inventions he develops in that employment absent a contract to the contrary
• employer who hired and paid employee to develop a process and machinery for production of the front spring used in a car was entitled to ownership of the patent on the product

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).