Standard Oil Co. v. Marlow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “good cause to entertain plaintiffs’ late-filed cross-motion” in part because “[t]here is no prejudice to defendants” and “plaintiffs have acted in good faith”
• “A claim of trademark infringement under New York law requires proof of the same elements and can be analyzed together with a Lanham Act claim.” (citing N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 360–k)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).