Skip to main content
· 2/2/1925

Standard Oil Co. v. Eckart

Citations

  • 4 F.2d 1023
  • 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that speech by a public employee outside the workplace was made in the employee's official capacity
  • holding a municipal government employee's remarks may not be protected under Connick if he was speaking as an employee, rather than as a citizen
  • holding a municipal govern- ment employee’s remarks may not be protected under Connick if he was speaking as an employee, rather than as a citizen
  • noting that a court may dispose of a case on the ground that no constitutional violation occurred without addressing qualified immunity
  • stating that claim of retaliatory reassignment of zoning investigator \to a geographic subset of the very region from which he formerly had derived his zoning assignments\ \likely would not be sufficiently adverse to implicate the First Amendment\
  • stating that claim of retaliatory reassignment of zoning investigator “to a geographic subset of the very region from which he formerly had derived his zoning assignments” “likely would not be sufficiently adverse to implicate the First Amendment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.