Standard Iron Works v. ArcelorMittal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plausibility despite lack of direct evidence of collective action by looking at a series of industry meetings attended by steel executives that were followed by industry-wide production cuts
• “Proof of Defendants’ opportunity to conspire does not alone suggest that there was an agreement to curtail production. But Plaintiffs’ allegations go further than pointing to opportunity alone.”
• “Defendant’s actions against self-interest constitute “widely recognized plus factor[]” suggestive of concerted action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).