Standard Bank & Trust Co. v. Iaquinta (In Re Iaquinta)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• subsequent acts of fraud do not demonstrate that a debtor had the requisite intent to deceive at the time the representation was made
• “Subsequent misrepresentations or fraud will, have no effect upon the discharge of the debtor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).