Stan v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiff “should not be 604 (“At the summary judgment stage . . . Plaintiff must demonstrate standing through specific facts via affidavits or other evidence.”) (emphasis added
• looking to whether the employees received training regarding service animals in stores and whether it conducted further training after plaintiff was injured to avoid recurrences
• dismissing ADA claims and declining to exercise jurisdiction over state law claims
• “[Ujnder the ADA, [defendants can and must ensure that they adopt the proper policies and procedures to train their employees on dealing with disabled individuals and make reasonable efforts to ensure that those policies and procedures are properly carried out and enforced.”
• “Although Plaintiff may have been humiliated or embarrassed by the way she was treated by Defendants, because they permitted her to shop at their stores without restriction, it is unlikely that this rises to the level of an injury under the ADA.”
• restaurant hundreds of miles from plaintiffs home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).