Skip to main content
· 10/7/2003

Stamtec, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Anson Stamping Company, Llc, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 346 F.3d 651
  • 51 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1048
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that third- party manufacturer’s “salvage loss charge” qualified as consequential damages and was not recoverable
  • remanding to the district court “[i]n light of the Tennessee Supreme Court’s presumption in favor of granting prejudgment interest”
  • The Tennessee Supreme Court observes a “presumption in favor of granting prejudgment interest.”
  • “[A] seller is not entitled to consequential damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Gilman, Gibbons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.