· 10/7/2003
Stamtec, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Anson Stamping Company, Llc, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
Citations
- 346 F.3d 651
- 51 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1048
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20363
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that third- party manufacturer’s “salvage loss charge” qualified as consequential damages and was not recoverable
- remanding to the district court “[i]n light of the Tennessee Supreme Court’s presumption in favor of granting prejudgment interest”
- The Tennessee Supreme Court observes a “presumption in favor of granting prejudgment interest.”
- “[A] seller is not entitled to consequential damages.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennedy, Gilman, Gibbons
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.