· 11/28/1925
Stamp v. Union Stevedoring Corp.
Citations
- 11 F.2d 172
- 1926 A.M.C. 165
- 1925 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1452
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Burford abstention was not warranted where New York had an interest in the subject matter of the litigation since the first two factors weighed against abstention
- finding that abstention was not warranted where statutory scheme and regulations did not rise to “the requisite degree of complexity”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dickinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.